Universal research paper outline template

This universal research paper outline helps create a clear and focused academic manuscript. It provides a structured framework that allows researchers to organise their ideas, streamline the writing process and ensure every section serves its purpose effectively. Moreover, this outline is universal and adaptable to any discipline or journal requirements, making it suitable for humanities, sciences or interdisciplinary studies. It consists of essential sections such as the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, references, and optional components like acknowledgements and appendices.

This blog post offers a comprehensive template, along with guiding questions, practical tips and examples from both the humanities and sciences, to help academic writers navigate the complexities of the writing process with confidence. Follow this research paper outline to produce a coherent and impactful article.

• Research paper outline template
• Next steps
• Tips for tailoring the outline to journal requirements
• Sample research paper 1: Humanities
• Sample research paper 2: Sciences
• Editing services
• Resources

Research paper outline paper

A research paper outline template is a structured framework that guides the organisation and development of an academic manuscript. It consists of the title, abstract, introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, references and optional components such as acknowledgements and appendices. To use it effectively, researchers can answer guiding questions for each section.

Title

• What is the main focus of the research?
• What keywords will help readers understand and locate the paper?
• Does the title clearly reflect the study’s scope, methods and findings?
• Is the title engaging, concise and aligned with the intended audience?

Abstract

The abstract summarises the research, providing a concise overview of the problem, objectives, methods, key findings and conclusions. It helps readers quickly determine the paper’s relevance to their interests.

• What problem is being addressed?
• What are the main objectives of the study?
• What methods were used to conduct the research?
• What are the key findings and conclusions?
• What are the study’s practical or theoretical implications?
• Does the abstract summarise the paper concisely within the word limit and without jargon?
• Does the abstract follow the customary structure consisting of background, objectives, methods, results, conclusions?

Introduction

• What is the background or context of the research problem?
• Why is this research important? What is its significance to the field or society?
• What is the research problem or question being addressed?
• What are the objectives or hypotheses of the study?
• How does this study relate to prior research or broader trends?
• What is the scope or limitations of the research being conducted?
• How is the paper structured to guide readers?

Literature review

The literature review analyses existing research, identifying gaps or inconsistencies the study addresses. It situates the research within the broader academic context and justifies the study’s necessity.

• What research has already been conducted on this topic?
• What are the main themes, trends and debates in the existing literature?
• What gaps, inconsistencies or unresolved questions exist in the literature?
• How does this study address the identified gaps?
• What theoretical or conceptual framework underpins the study?
• Are the sources comprehensive, relevant and up-to-date?
• How does the literature review justify the research approach or methodology?

Methods

The methods section details the study’s design, data collection and analysis techniques. It ensures transparency and allows others to replicate the study or evaluate its validity.

• What research design (qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods) is appropriate for the study?
• How was the data collected (e.g. surveys, experiments, interviews, secondary data)?
• What population or sample was studied and how was it selected?
• What tools or techniques were used for analysis and are they appropriate for the data?
• Why were these methods chosen and are they reliable and valid?
• What ethical considerations (e.g. consent, confidentiality) were addressed?
• Were any pilot studies or pre-tests conducted to refine the methodology?
• Are the methods described in sufficient detail to allow replication?

Results

The results section presents the study’s findings objectively, often using tables, graphs or figures. It focuses on the data without interpreting its implications.

• What are the key findings of the research?
• Are the results presented clearly and logically, with appropriate use of tables, graphs or figures?
• Are any statistical analyses, significance levels or trends reported?
• Are all results relevant to the research question or objectives?
• Are any unexpected findings highlighted or discussed?

Discussion

The discussion interprets the results, linking them to the research question and existing literature. It explores implications, acknowledges limitations and suggests directions for future research.

• How do the results compare with previous studies or existing knowledge?
• What do the results mean in the context of the research question?
• What theoretical or practical implications arise from these findings?
• What limitations or biases were encountered and how do they affect the interpretation of the results?
• How do the results inform future research directions or policy recommendations?
• Are any alternative explanations for the findings considered?

Conclusion

The conclusion summarises the key findings and their significance, offering final insights or recommendations. It reinforces the study’s contribution and leaves a lasting impression on the reader.

• What are the key findings of the study?
• How do these findings contribute to the field or address the research problem?
• What final thoughts or recommendations can be drawn from the research?
• Does the conclusion avoid introducing new information and focus on synthesising the paper’s main points?

References

The references list provides full citations for all sources used in the research, ensuring transparency and allowing readers to locate the original materials.

• Have all cited works been properly referenced, including in-text citations and bibliography?
• Do the references follow the required style guide?
• Are all sources relevant, up-to-date and appropriately diverse?
• Have any datasets, software or materials used been cited?

Optional sections

Acknowledgements

The acknowledgements section credits individuals organisations or funding bodies that supported the research, demonstrating gratitude and transparency.

• Who provided funding, support or assistance during the study (e.g. funding agencies, collaborators)?
• Are any conflicts of interest disclosed?

Appendices

Appendices include supplementary materials, such as raw data, detailed methodologies or additional analyses, which support the main text without disrupting its flow.

• Are there supplementary materials (e.g. data sets, questionnaires, coding schemes) that support the main text?
• Are these materials clearly labelled and referenced within the paper?

Supplementary information

• Is there any additional documentation (e.g. videos, extended analyses) that enhances understanding of the research?
• Are supplementary files formatted and shared according to journal or repository guidelines?

Next steps

The following steps will take the outline from a starting point to a polished, submission-ready research paper.

1. Refine the research question: First, clearly articulate the problem or question your research addresses. This will guide the paper’s focus and help structure each section.
2. Collect and organise your resources: Next, gather relevant studies, datasets and notes. Use tools like citation managers (e.g. Zotero, Mendeley) to streamline referencing.
3. Draft a detailed outline: Start filling out each section of the template with bullet points or brief notes based on your research.
4. Write the first draft: Use the outline as a roadmap. Focus on content rather than perfection — leave detailed editing for later stages.
5. Review journal requirements: Double-check the journal’s submission guidelines and adjust your draft to comply with formatting, structure and style expectations.
6. Seek feedback: Share the draft with colleagues, mentors or collaborators for constructive criticism.
7. Revise and refine: Edit for clarity, coherence and conciseness. Ensure all sections connect logically and that language is precise.
8. Proofread and format: Check for grammar, spelling and formatting errors. Confirm that references are correctly formatted and figures/tables meet submission standards.
9. Submit and follow up: Finally, submit your paper to the chosen journal, ensuring all required documents (such as. cover letter, supplementary files) are included. Track the submission status and respond promptly to reviewer feedback.

Tips for tailoring the outline to journal requirements

• Read the author guidelines carefully: Review the target journal’s instructions for authors, which typically outline specific structural requirements, word limits and formatting preferences.
• Match the section structure: Ensure the template aligns with the journal’s specified headings and subheadings (for example, some journals might require a ‘Findings’ section instead of ‘Results’).
• Check abstract format: Verify whether the journal requires a structured or unstructured abstract and adhere to word count limits.
• Adapt referencing style: Use the exact citation style (for instance, APA, MLA or Chicago) and ensure in-text citations and reference lists meet the guidelines.
• Focus on audience expectations: Adapt tone, language and content to match the journal’s readership. For example, highly technical journals may expect specialised terminology, while broader-audience journals may require accessible language.
• Include mandatory sections: Add any required sections, such as data availability statements, conflicts of interest disclosures or graphical abstracts.
• Follow word count constraints: Adjust the depth of each section to fit within the paper’s total word limit.
• Incorporate specific formatting rules: Use required templates for headings, tables, figures and supplementary materials and check for any formatting restrictions (for example, font size, margin requirements).

Sample research paper 1: Humanities

Title: The role of dystopian fiction in critiquing contemporary political ideologies

Abstract: This study examines how dystopian fiction serves as a vehicle for critiquing political ideologies in contemporary society. Using George Orwell’s 1984 and Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale as case studies, the research analyses narrative techniques and thematic elements that reflect societal fears and political critiques. Findings reveal that these works use speculative settings to challenge authoritarianism and gender oppression, offering insights into the intersection of literature and political discourse.

Introduction: Dystopian fiction has long provided a lens through which societies examine their anxieties and political structures. In an age of rising authoritarianism and socio-political divides, this genre’s relevance has only increased. This paper explores how 1984 and The Handmaid’s Tale critique contemporary political ideologies, focusing on their depiction of authoritarianism and gender dynamics.

Literature review: Prior research highlights dystopian fiction’s role in reflecting societal fears (Smith, 2015) and interrogating political systems (Jones, 2018). However, few studies explicitly compare Orwell’s and Atwood’s works in the context of current political ideologies. This paper fills that gap, linking narrative techniques to political critique.

Methods: The study employs qualitative textual analysis, examining themes, characterisation and narrative techniques in 1984 and The Handmaid’s Tale. In addition, the analysis contextualises these findings within contemporary socio-political issues.

Results: The analysis identifies key themes of surveillance and propaganda in 1984 and gender subjugation in The Handmaid’s Tale. Both works critique authoritarian structures and highlight the human cost of political extremism.

Discussion: The findings suggest that dystopian fiction acts as a mirror to contemporary political issues. Orwell’s portrayal of surveillance resonates with modern debates about privacy, while Atwood’s focus on gender oppression parallels ongoing struggles for women’s rights.

Conclusion: Dystopian fiction remains a critical tool for societal reflection and critique. Future research could explore its application in non-Western contexts or emerging digital media.

References

• Smith, J. (2015). Dystopian Literature and Political Critique. Cambridge University Press.
• Jones, A. (2018). Narrative and Ideology in Modern Fiction. Oxford University Press.

Sample research paper 2: Sciences

Title: The effects of microplastics on aquatic invertebrate health: A case study of Daphnia magna

Abstract: Microplastics are an emerging environmental pollutant with potential impacts on aquatic ecosystems. This study investigates their effects on Daphnia magna, a key species in freshwater ecosystems. Results indicate that exposure to microplastics reduces feeding efficiency and reproductive rates, highlighting the ecological risks posed by plastic pollution.

Introduction: Microplastics, defined as plastic particles <5 mm in size, have become pervasive in aquatic environments. Their impact on aquatic invertebrates, which play crucial roles in food webs, remains underexplored. This study examines how microplastics affect the health and reproduction of Daphnia magna, a model organism.

Literature review: Existing research identifies microplastics as carriers of pollutants (Thompson et al., 2018) and disruptors of feeding behaviour (Anderson, 2020). However, limited studies quantify their effects on reproductive health in invertebrates. This research bridges this gap by analysing feeding and reproductive metrics in Daphnia magna.

Methods: A laboratory experiment exposed Daphnia magna to three concentrations of microplastics (low, medium, high) over 14 days. Feeding efficiency was measured by algal consumption and reproductive rates were assessed by neonate production.

Results: Higher concentrations of microplastics significantly reduced feeding efficiency (p<0.05) and reproductive rates (p<0.01). Moreover, visual inspection revealed microplastics in the gut, indicating ingestion.

Discussion: The findings suggest that microplastics interfere with Daphnia magna’s ability to feed and reproduce, potentially disrupting aquatic ecosystems. These effects underscore the need for stricter regulations on plastic waste.

Conclusion: Microplastics pose significant ecological risks to aquatic invertebrates. Further research should explore long-term and multi-species impacts to guide conservation efforts.

References

• Thompson, R. et al. (2018). Microplastics in Aquatic Systems: Impacts and Risks. Environmental Science & Technology.
• Anderson, L. (2020). Feeding Disruption In Freshwater Invertebrates by Microplastics. Aquatic Ecology.

Editing services

Professional editing services are invaluable when preparing a research paper for journal publication, as they ensure the manuscript meets the highest standards of clarity, coherence and adherence to journal guidelines. Different types of editing — proofreading, copyediting and line editing — address specific aspects of the paper, each contributing uniquely to its quality.

Proofreading

Proofreading focuses on correcting surface-level errors such as grammar, spelling, punctuation and formatting mistakes. By ensuring the paper is free of errors, proofreading enhances its readability and overall professionalism. For example, it eliminates typos, standardises tenses and corrects formatting issues like misplaced citations.

Copyediting

Copyediting takes a deeper approach by refining the language, style and consistency of the text. This process ensures that the paper is clear and coherent while adhering to the target journal’s style guide. In addition, copyeditors improve awkward phrasing, ensure the correct use of technical terms and standardise headings or abbreviations to make the paper more polished and aligned with publication standards.

Line editing

This service examines the text at an even deeper level, focusing on the paper’s style, tone and flow. Line editors enhance readability and engagement by refining the narrative and improving transitions between ideas. Moreover, they may rewrite unclear sentences, improve paragraph structure and maintain a consistent academic tone while eliminating redundancy.

Resources

Reference and citation management tools

• EndNote: Advanced reference management software for detailed bibliographies.
• Mendeley: Combines reference management with academic networking.
• Zotero: A free, user-friendly tool for collecting organising and citing sources.

Writing and grammar tools

• Grammarly: Assists with grammar, punctuation and style refinement.
• Hemingway Editor: Highlights overly complex sentences to improve readability.
• ProWritingAid: A robust tool for grammar checking, style improvement and writing analysis.

Academic writing guides

• Purdue OWL (Online Writing Lab): Comprehensive guidance on academic writing, including citation styles.
• The Elements of Style by Strunk and White: A classic guide on writing principles.

Formatting and style guides

• APA Style Guide: Essential for psychology and social sciences papers.
• Chicago Manual of Style: Covers notes-bibliography and author-date citation systems.
• MLA Handbook: Used for humanities disciplines, especially literature.

Plagiarism checkers

• Quetext: User-friendly plagiarism checker for academic papers.

Research organisation tools

• Evernote: Organises notes, ideas and references in one place.
• Trello: A project management tool to organise tasks during the research process.
• Notion: Combines note-taking organisation and collaboration for research projects.

Statistical and data analysis software

• SPSS: A powerful tool for statistical analysis in social sciences.
• R Project: Open-source software for statistical computing and graphics.
• Python (with libraries like Pandas and NumPy): Ideal for data analysis and visualisation.

Key takeaways

In conclusion, following a research paper outline paper simplifies the writing process and enhances the quality and coherence of the final manuscript. By using a structured template, addressing key questions in each section and tailoring your work to journal requirements, you can improve your chances of publication. With the resources and guidance provided in this blog, you have all the tools needed to turn your ideas into a polished research paper. Start with an outline, stay focused and let the research paper outline paper the writing process.

Contact me if you are an academic author looking for editing or indexing services. I am an experienced editor offering a free sample edit and an early bird discount.